Wide Sargasso Sea – Not Enough Good Parts
Sunday, September 5th, 2010Books Left: 93
My first re-read was very difficult, and it derailed me from the project again. One good thing about English classes was the deadlines. No matter how much a book bored you, it had to be read by a particular time. Of course, I was doing this until I took the time limit off my project. Things are different now. Not only do I have a full time job but it requires full time work; I can’t be sitting at my desk reading all day.
But this isn’t about how good or bad I may be at time management. This is about Jean Rhys’s Whide Sargasso Sea and how I tried to like it despite of itself.
The first time I read the book it was right after I’d put down Jane Eyre. It was impossible for me to separate the second narrative’s connection to the first. I couldn’t get over the fact that Wide Sargasso Sea seemed to be actively trying to ruin Jane Eyre for me. This time I tried not to think about Jane Eyre and read the story as something separate from anything else.
Is the book well written?
Wide Sargasso Sea uses exquisite language. The descriptions of the scenery are such that you can almost feel the sticky heat, smell the dying flowers thick with perfume, and see the colors that feel splashed around like in a painting. Jean Rhys spent a great deal of time writing and editing the book, which you can tell from the word choice and flow of the novel.
Other aspects of the writing are not perfect: if the intent is to make the reader feel for Antionette, this is difficult, since she seems to be stuck in a very childlike mindset throughout the book and to me seems to me to be actually, in some way, crazy. Not that being locked in an attic is the best treatment for someone who needs mental help, but given the time period, much worse things could have happened to her. I feel like the book is trying too hard to feel sorry for Antionette. I did pity Antionette, but I couldn’t empathize with her.
The book skips over what I think would have been the most interesting part: Antionette and Rochester’s courtship. In Part 2, which is narrated by Rochester, he claims to have had genuine feelings for Antionette during the courtship. But we don’t know if this is true or not, as he could easily be an unreliable narrator. This part would’ve been fascinating and enjoyable to read and it’s just skipped over. We get very few light spots on the novel. It goes from bad, to more bad, to worse, which I think is unaffected. One of the reasons why Shakespeare’s tragedies are so effective is because they included pieces of comedy, e.g., the grave digger scene in Hamlet right before the final tragic scene.
Does it speak about the human condition?
Wide Sargasso Sea discusses many aspects of the human condition: wealth and poverty, sanity, love, lust, race and racism, cruelty, and kindness. This is quite a long list for such a short book and it often feels as though it’s trying to stuff in too much at once.
Is it groundbreaking in some way?
It’s not the first work of post-colonial fiction. It’s not the first fanfic (yes, I went there). It’s the first critically acclaimed post-colonial fanfic? Yes, I think we can say that’s true.
Is it an enjoyable read?
It’s enjoyable if you can get past the plot, the characters, and the forced messages and concentrate on the language and descriptions. Unfortunately both times I’ve read it I was unable to do this, so I’m going to say no.
In the end, I would not say Wide Sargasso Sea belongs on the list of top 100 books of the 20th century. It’s a shame that Rhys’s wordcraft was wasted on this novel; I think I would like to read her other books at some point.
Next up is The Magus by John Fowles. Has anyone read it?






